Test results for armeabi, tinker, crypto_aead/aes128n12clocv1

[Page version: 20241024 12:18:11]

Measurements for armeabi, tinker, crypto_aead Test results for armeabi, tinker, crypto_aead Test results for crypto_aead/aes128n12clocv1
Computer: tinker
Microarchitecture: armeabi; Cortex-A17 (410fc0d1)
Architecture: armeabi
CPU ID: unknown CPU ID
SUPERCOP version: 20240909
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: aes128n12clocv1
TimeObject sizeTest sizeImplementationCompilerBenchmark dateSUPERCOP version
21422322432 0 036349 416 824T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024092620240909
26771620374 0 029244 380 816T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024092620240909
28134721936 0 032380 388 816T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024092620240909

Test failure


error 111

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 2, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c:78:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:73:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 1, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_14.0.6)

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function ‘crypto_aead_aes128n12clocv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt’:
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:73:5: warning: this ‘for’ clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    73 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:78:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the ‘for’
encrypt.c:    78 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)

Namespace violations


aes_core.o AES_decrypt T
aes_core.o AES_encrypt T
aes_core.o AES_set_decrypt_key T
aes_core.o AES_set_encrypt_key T
aes_core.o print_state T
cloc.o ae_encrypt T
cloc.o ae_init T
cloc.o process_ad T
utils.o ae_allocate T
utils.o print_cxt T
utils.o pstate T
utils.o xor_block T
utils.o xor_bytes T
utils.o xor_bytes2 T

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 3, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_14.0.6)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)