Test results for amd64, wooden, crypto_aead/aes128n8clocv1
[Page version: 20241030 00:12:07]
Measurements for amd64, wooden, crypto_aead
Test results for amd64, wooden, crypto_aead
Test results for crypto_aead/aes128n8clocv1
Computer: wooden
Microarchitecture: amd64; Goldmont (506c9)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-000506c9-1fc9cbf5
SUPERCOP version: 20241022
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: aes128n8clocv1
Time | Object size | Test size | Implementation | Compiler | Benchmark date | SUPERCOP version |
151672 | 20349 0 0 | 33626 784 856 | T:ref | clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240701 | 20240625 |
154726 | 20406 0 0 | 32959 736 896 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240701 | 20240625 |
159596 | 25436 0 0 | 40804 760 928 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240701 | 20240625 |
159968 | 21408 0 0 | 35131 752 928 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240701 | 20240625 |
160492 | 21683 0 0 | 35852 760 928 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240701 | 20240625 |
206800 | 22342 0 0 | 38548 792 856 | T:ref | clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240701 | 20240625 |
212636 | 20827 0 0 | 34682 784 856 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240701 | 20240625 |
216504 | 21870 0 0 | 39372 792 856 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240701 | 20240625 |
217098 | 21168 0 0 | 36364 792 856 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240701 | 20240625 |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:77:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c: for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1) |
T:ref | clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1) |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_aes128n8clocv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: 72 | for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: | ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:77:2: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c: 77 | return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: | ^~~~~~
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110) |