Test results for armeabi, berry2, crypto_aead/aes128n8silcv1

[Page version: 20241120 00:22:57]

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_aes128n8silcv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:73:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    73 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:78:2: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    78 |  return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |  ^~~~~~
silc.c: silc.c: In function 'process_ad':
silc.c: silc.c:39:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2'; did you mean 'pstate'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:    39 |  pstate2("processing nonce:", NULL);
silc.c:       |  ^~~~~~~
silc.c:       |  pstate

Namespace violations

aes_core.o AES_decrypt T
aes_core.o AES_encrypt T
aes_core.o AES_set_decrypt_key T
aes_core.o AES_set_encrypt_key T
aes_core.o print_state T
silc.o ae_encrypt T
silc.o ae_init T
silc.o process_ad T
utils.o ae_allocate T
utils.o print_cxt T
utils.o pstate T
utils.o pstate2 T
utils.o xor_bytes T
utils.o xor_bytes2 T