Test results for amd64, wolfdale, crypto_aead/aes128n12silcv1

[Page version: 20241024 06:28:49]

Measurements for amd64, wolfdale, crypto_aead Test results for amd64, wolfdale, crypto_aead Test results for crypto_aead/aes128n12silcv1
Computer: wolfdale
Microarchitecture: amd64; Core 2 45nm (1067a)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-0001067a-bfebfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20241022
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: aes128n12silcv1
TimeObject sizeTest sizeImplementationCompilerBenchmark dateSUPERCOP version
16482825022 0 040657 796 1080T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
17690720915 0 033956 772 1048T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
17711122126 0 036849 796 1080T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
18351621930 0 036183 788 1080T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
19320423266 0 039891 820 1016T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
19374023354 0 040115 820 1016T:refclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
19498120887 0 034545 812 1016T:refclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
19705321499 0 035753 812 1016T:refclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
19889222502 0 038435 820 1016T:refclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c:77:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.
silc.c: silc.c:39:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:         pstate2("processing nonce:", NULL);
silc.c:         ^
silc.c: silc.c:101:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring message block:", es);
silc.c:                         ^
silc.c: silc.c:106:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring ciphertext block:", es);
silc.c:                         ^
silc.c: silc.c:110:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                 pstate2("tag state:", ts);
silc.c:                 ^
silc.c: silc.c:127:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring last partial message block:", es);
silc.c:                         ^
silc.c: silc.c:132:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring last partial ciphertext block:", es);
silc.c:                         ^
silc.c: silc.c:136:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                 pstate2("tag state:", ts);
silc.c:                 ^
silc.c: silc.c:147:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:         pstate2("After xoring the legnth of message:", ts);
silc.c:         ^
silc.c: 8 warnings generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_aes128n12silcv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    72 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:77:2: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    77 |  return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |  ^~~~~~
silc.c: silc.c: In function 'process_ad':
silc.c: silc.c:39:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2'; did you mean 'pstate'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:    39 |  pstate2("processing nonce:", NULL);
silc.c:       |  ^~~~~~~
silc.c:       |  pstate

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)