Test results for amd64, speed2supercop, crypto_aead/present80n6t4silcv3

[Page version: 20241023 21:37:24]

Measurements for amd64, speed2supercop, crypto_aead Test results for amd64, speed2supercop, crypto_aead Test results for crypto_aead/present80n6t4silcv3
Computer: speed2supercop
Microarchitecture: amd64; Haswell+AES (306c3)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-000306c3-1fc9cbf5
SUPERCOP version: 20241022
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: present80n6t4silcv3
TimeObject sizeTest sizeImplementationCompilerBenchmark dateSUPERCOP version
4224444675 752 51221886 1552 1392T:vpermclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
4226124356 752 51218463 1544 1440T:vpermclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
4295444675 752 51222078 1552 1392T:vpermclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
4706604856 752 51220613 1512 1440T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
4754924582 752 51218341 1512 1440T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
5735884890 752 51218142 1552 1376T:vpermclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
11991724179 752 51217644 1504 1440T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
12010563694 752 51215944 1488 1408T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
215417044413 0 021878 792 872T:refclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
216557284311 0 021574 792 872T:refclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
222134882696 0 016479 760 928T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
222672284641 0 020399 760 928T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
232923602573 0 015878 792 856T:refclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
249914722755 0 016887 784 920T:refclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
252596284027 0 020086 792 856T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
259118402677 0 016076 744 928T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
337141962347 0 014610 736 896T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c:70:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:65:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))
T:refclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))
T:refclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))
T:refclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))
T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_present80n6t4silcv3_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:65:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    65 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:70:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    70 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (13.3.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c:70:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:65:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.
silc.c: silc.c:170:34: warning: implicit conversion from 'int' to 'char' changes value from 128 to -128 [-Wconstant-conversion]
silc.c:         state = XORDQW(tmpState, SHR(state, 8));
silc.c:                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
silc.c: ./common.h:30:126: note: expanded from macro 'SHR'
silc.c: #define SHR(x,n)        _mm_shuffle_epi8((x), _mm_set_epi8(127+(n), 126+(n), 125+(n), 124+(n), 123+(n), 122+(n), 121+(n), 120+(n), 119+(n), 118+(n), 117+(n), 116+(n), 115+(n), 114+(n), 113+(n), 112+(n))) // shift to the right
silc.c:                                               ~~~~~~~~~~~~                                                                   ^
silc.c: ./common.h:17:43: note: expanded from macro 'XORDQW'
silc.c: #define XORDQW(x, y)            _mm_xor_si128((x), (y))
silc.c:                                                     ^
silc.c: silc.c:170:34: warning: implicit conversion from 'int' to 'char' changes value from 129 to -127 [-Wconstant-conversion]
silc.c:         state = XORDQW(tmpState, SHR(state, 8));
silc.c:                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
silc.c: ./common.h:30:117: note: expanded from macro 'SHR'
silc.c: #define SHR(x,n)        _mm_shuffle_epi8((x), _mm_set_epi8(127+(n), 126+(n), 125+(n), 124+(n), 123+(n), 122+(n), 121+(n), 120+(n), 119+(n), 118+(n), 117+(n), 116+(n), 115+(n), 114+(n), 113+(n), 112+(n))) // shift to the right
silc.c:                                               ~~~~~~~~~~~~                                                          ^
silc.c: ./common.h:17:43: note: expanded from macro 'XORDQW'
silc.c: #define XORDQW(x, y)            _mm_xor_si128((x), (y))
silc.c:                                                     ^
silc.c: silc.c:170:34: warning: implicit conversion from 'int' to 'char' changes value from 130 to -126 [-Wconstant-conversion]
silc.c:         state = XORDQW(tmpState, SHR(state, 8));
silc.c:                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
silc.c: ./common.h:30:108: note: expanded from macro 'SHR'
silc.c: #define SHR(x,n)        _mm_shuffle_epi8((x), _mm_set_epi8(127+(n), 126+(n), 125+(n), 124+(n), 123+(n), 122+(n), 121+(n), 120+(n), 119+(n), 118+(n), 117+(n), 116+(n), 115+(n), 114+(n), 113+(n), 112+(n))) // shift to the right
silc.c:                                               ~~~~~~~~~~~~                                                 ^
silc.c: ./common.h:17:43: note: expanded from macro 'XORDQW'
silc.c: ...

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:vpermclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))
T:vpermclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))
T:vpermclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))
T:vpermclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c:70:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:65:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.
present.c: present.c:112:15: error: always_inline function '_mm_shuffle_epi8' requires target feature 'ssse3', but would be inlined into function 'format_input' that is compiled without support for 'ssse3'
present.c:         dqword tmp = PSHUFB(*state, LOAD(PRESENTInShuffleU));
present.c:                      ^
present.c: ./common.h:40:22: note: expanded from macro 'PSHUFB'
present.c: #define PSHUFB(s, x)    _mm_shuffle_epi8((s), (x)) /*return s(x)*/
present.c:                         ^
present.c: present.c:113:11: error: always_inline function '_mm_shuffle_epi8' requires target feature 'ssse3', but would be inlined into function 'format_input' that is compiled without support for 'ssse3'
present.c:         *state = PSHUFB(*state, LOAD(PRESENTInShuffleL));
present.c:                  ^
present.c: ./common.h:40:22: note: expanded from macro 'PSHUFB'
present.c: #define PSHUFB(s, x)    _mm_shuffle_epi8((s), (x)) /*return s(x)*/
present.c:                         ^
present.c: 2 errors generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 1, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:vpermclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_present80n6t4silcv3_vperm_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:65:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    65 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:70:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    70 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~
silc.c: silc.c: In function 'ae_decrypt':
silc.c: silc.c:190:12: warning: unused variable 'tmpState' [-Wunused-variable]
silc.c:   190 |     dqword tmpState;
silc.c:       |            ^~~~~~~~

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (13.3.0)
T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)
T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)
T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)