Test results for amd64, speed2supercop, crypto_aead/present80n6silcv1

[Page version: 20241023 21:37:24]

Measurements for amd64, speed2supercop, crypto_aead Test results for amd64, speed2supercop, crypto_aead Test results for crypto_aead/present80n6silcv1

Computer: speed2supercop
Microarchitecture: amd64; Haswell+AES (306c3)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-000306c3-1fc9cbf5
SUPERCOP version: 20241022
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: present80n6silcv1

Time	Object size	Test size	Implementation	Compiler	Benchmark date	SUPERCOP version
21401760	4366 0 0	21838 792 872	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
21661528	4264 0 0	21534 792 872	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
22212052	4643 0 0	20407 760 928	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
22243160	2672 0 0	16471 760 928	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
23294208	2529 0 0	15838 792 856	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
24940444	2717 0 0	16863 784 920	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
25269592	3957 0 0	20014 792 856	`T:ref`	`clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
25960032	2674 0 0	16084 744 928	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
33413836	2336 0 0	14610 736 896	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:67:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))`
`T:ref`	`clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))`

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_present80n6silcv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:67:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    67 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    72 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (13.3.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)`