Test results for amd64, speed2supercop, crypto_aead/led80n6silcv1

[Page version: 20240911 13:07:51]

Measurements for amd64, speed2supercop, crypto_aead Test results for amd64, speed2supercop, crypto_aead Test results for crypto_aead/led80n6silcv1

Computer: speed2supercop
Microarchitecture: amd64; Haswell+AES (306c3)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-000306c3-1fc9cbf5
SUPERCOP version: 20240909
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: led80n6silcv1

Time	Object size	Test size	Implementation	Compiler	Benchmark date	SUPERCOP version
15019420	7854 4 4	25182 796 880	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
15165376	7956 4 4	25486 796 880	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
39228088	6083 4 4	22206 796 864	`T:ref`	`clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
48576296	7968 4 4	23799 764 936	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
73557740	3096 4 4	15434 740 904	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
74133332	3712 4 4	17567 764 936	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
77699128	4260 4 4	17622 796 864	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
78708952	3644 4 4	17108 748 936	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
94766884	3796 4 4	18007 788 920	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:67:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))`
`T:ref`	`clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_16.0.6_(27+b1))`

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_led80n6silcv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:67:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    67 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    72 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (13.3.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (13.3.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (13.3.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (13.3.0)`