Implementation notes: amd64, rumba7, crypto_aead/flexaead128b064v12

Computer: rumba7
Microarchitecture: amd64; Zen (800f11)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: AuthenticAMD-00800f11-178bfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20240625
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: flexaead128b064v12
TimeObject sizeTest sizeImplementationCompilerBenchmark dateSUPERCOP version
30263911153 0 028563 844 1056T:opt1clang_-march=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
31358113025 0 029515 844 1024T:opt1clang_-mcpu=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
3236798610 0 023564 796 1088T:opt1gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
33430310623 0 027643 844 1056T:opt1clang_-march=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
3410309747 0 025325 804 1088T:opt1gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
3412768823 0 022827 844 1024T:opt1clang_-march=native_-O_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
36265010307 0 024893 836 1088T:opt1clang_-march=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
3644056106 0 019808 780 1056T:opt1gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
4029019014 0 024235 820 1088T:refgcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
40510415908 0 032771 844 1056T:refclang_-march=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
40524415988 0 033227 844 1056T:refclang_-march=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
4056479660 0 023659 844 1024T:refclang_-march=native_-O_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
4066319980 0 025755 820 1088T:refgcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
42192321968 0 038427 844 1024T:refclang_-mcpu=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
44716411462 0 025997 836 1088T:refclang_-march=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
4769376012 0 019894 796 1056T:refgcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625

Checksum failure


8764d3b5d24be947bf73f3d8d72871bd05eb7e3263116138176b4a47499f61ef

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 1, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:opt1gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c:777:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         dirPFK( block, (*self).nBytes, ((*self).subkeys + SUBKEY0),  (*self).nRounds, (*self).state );
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:774:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for( unsigned i = 0; i<(*self).nBytes; i+=8)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:799:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         invPFK( block, (*self).nBytes, ((*self).subkeys + SUBKEY1),  (*self).nRounds, (*self).state );
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:796:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for( unsigned i = 0; i<(*self).nBytes; i+=8)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 2 warnings generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:refclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:refclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:refclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)

Compiler output


encrypt.c: In function 'dirShuffleLayer',
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirPFK' at encrypt.c:631:3,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'sumAD.constprop' at encrypt.c:745:5:
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:585:34: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
encrypt.c:   585 |                 *(state+(2*i+0)) = *(block+(0*(blocklen/2)+i));
encrypt.c:       |                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'sumAD.constprop':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:48:18: note: at offset 8 into destination object 'state' of size 8
encrypt.c:    48 |    unsigned char state[BLOCKSIZE];
encrypt.c:       |                  ^~~~~
encrypt.c: In function 'dirShuffleLayer',
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirPFK' at encrypt.c:631:3,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'sumAD.constprop' at encrypt.c:745:5:
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:586:34: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
encrypt.c:   586 |                 *(state+(2*i+1)) = *(block+(1*(blocklen/2)+i));
encrypt.c:       |                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'sumAD.constprop':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:48:18: note: at offset [9, 4294967273] into destination object 'state' of size 8
encrypt.c:    48 |    unsigned char state[BLOCKSIZE];
encrypt.c:       |                  ^~~~~
encrypt.c: In function 'dirShuffleLayer',
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirPFK' at encrypt.c:631:3,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'sumAD.constprop' at encrypt.c:745:5:
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:585:34: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
encrypt.c:   585 |                 *(state+(2*i+0)) = *(block+(0*(blocklen/2)+i));
encrypt.c: ...

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 1, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)