Implementation notes: amd64, rumba5, crypto_aead/led80n6silcv1

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:67:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_led80n6silcv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:67:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    67 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    72 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~

Namespace violations

led.o AddConstants T
led.o AddKey T
led.o DEBUG B
led.o FieldMult T
led.o LED D
led.o LED80_enc T
led.o LED_enc T
led.o MixColMatrix R
led.o MixColumn T
led.o ShiftRow T
led.o SubCell T
led.o WORDFILTER R
led.o sbox R
silc.o ae_encrypt T
silc.o ae_init T
silc.o process_ad T
utils.o ae_allocate T
utils.o print_cxt T
utils.o pstate T
utils.o xor_bytes T
utils.o xor_bytes2 T