Test results for amd64, r24000, crypto_aead/aes128n12silcv1
[Page version: 20241016 00:06:19]
Measurements for amd64, r24000, crypto_aead
Test results for amd64, r24000, crypto_aead
Test results for crypto_aead/aes128n12silcv1
Computer: r24000
Microarchitecture: amd64; Coffee Lake (906ea)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-000906ea-bfebfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20241011
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: aes128n12silcv1
Time | Object size | Test size | Implementation | Compiler | Benchmark date | SUPERCOP version |
114046 | 24811 0 0 | 42142 820 1096 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240728 | 20240716 |
117983 | 21613 0 0 | 36862 820 1096 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240728 | 20240716 |
125144 | 22202 0 0 | 37068 812 1096 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240728 | 20240716 |
130465 | 20982 0 0 | 34585 796 1064 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240728 | 20240716 |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:77:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c: for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.
silc.c: silc.c:39:2: error: call to undeclared function 'pstate2'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c: pstate2("processing nonce:", NULL);
silc.c: ^
silc.c: silc.c:39:2: note: did you mean 'pstate'?
silc.c: ./silc.h:61:6: note: 'pstate' declared here
silc.c: void pstate(const unsigned char* st, int len);
silc.c: ^
silc.c: silc.c:101:4: error: call to undeclared function 'pstate2'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c: pstate2("After xoring message block:", es);
silc.c: ^
silc.c: silc.c:106:4: error: call to undeclared function 'pstate2'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c: pstate2("After xoring ciphertext block:", es);
silc.c: ^
silc.c: silc.c:110:3: error: call to undeclared function 'pstate2'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c: pstate2("tag state:", ts);
silc.c: ^
silc.c: silc.c:127:4: error: call to undeclared function 'pstate2'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c: pstate2("After xoring last partial message block:", es);
silc.c: ^
silc.c: silc.c:132:4: error: call to undeclared function 'pstate2'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c: pstate2("After xoring last partial ciphertext block:", es);
silc.c: ^
silc.c: silc.c:136:3: error: call to undeclared function 'pstate2'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c: pstate2("tag state:", ts);
silc.c: ^
silc.c: ...
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_16.0.6_(15)) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_16.0.6_(15)) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_16.0.6_(15)) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_16.0.6_(15)) |
T:ref | clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_16.0.6_(15)) |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_aes128n12silcv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: 72 | for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: | ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:77:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c: 77 | return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: | ^~~~~~
silc.c: silc.c: In function 'process_ad':
silc.c: silc.c:39:9: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2'; did you mean 'pstate'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c: 39 | pstate2("processing nonce:", NULL);
silc.c: | ^~~~~~~
silc.c: | pstate
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (13.2.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (13.2.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (13.2.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (13.2.0) |
Namespace violations
aes_core.o AES_decrypt T
aes_core.o AES_encrypt T
aes_core.o AES_set_decrypt_key T
aes_core.o AES_set_encrypt_key T
aes_core.o print_state T
silc.o ae_encrypt T
silc.o ae_init T
silc.o process_ad T
utils.o ae_allocate T
utils.o print_cxt T
utils.o pstate T
utils.o pstate2 T
utils.o xor_bytes T
utils.o xor_bytes2 T
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (13.2.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (13.2.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (13.2.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (13.2.0) |