Test results for amd64, nucnuc, crypto_aead/led80n6t4silcv2

[Page version: 20240922 13:29:56]

Measurements for amd64, nucnuc, crypto_aead Test results for amd64, nucnuc, crypto_aead Test results for crypto_aead/led80n6t4silcv2
Computer: nucnuc
Microarchitecture: amd64; Airmont (406c3)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-000406c3-bfebfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20240909
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: led80n6t4silcv2
TimeObject sizeTest sizeImplementationCompilerBenchmark dateSUPERCOP version
472548315438 4 420664 816 1016T:refclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070420240625
473010185867 4 422728 816 1016T:refclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070420240625
478254996289 4 422672 816 1016T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070420240625
947850678389 4 424210 792 1112T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070420240625
2076298593524 4 417590 808 1016T:refclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070420240625
2134465743337 4 416822 808 1016T:refclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070420240625
2148395203740 4 417839 776 1112T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070420240625
2153969473855 4 418498 792 1112T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070420240625
3870867193137 4 416149 768 1080T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070420240625

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c:68:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:63:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_led80n6t4silcv2_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:63:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    63 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:68:2: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    68 |  return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |  ^~~~~~

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)