Test results for amd64, nucnuc, crypto_aead/aes128n12silcv1

[Page version: 20240922 13:29:56]

Measurements for amd64, nucnuc, crypto_aead Test results for amd64, nucnuc, crypto_aead Test results for crypto_aead/aes128n12silcv1
Computer: nucnuc
Microarchitecture: amd64; Airmont (406c3)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-000406c3-bfebfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20240909
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: aes128n12silcv1
TimeObject sizeTest sizeImplementationCompilerBenchmark dateSUPERCOP version
23434326002 0 041881 796 1080T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
25609522084 0 036801 796 1080T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
26256720923 0 034657 812 1016T:refclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
26645520949 0 034020 772 1048T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
28586421922 0 036175 788 1080T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
31553123266 0 039915 820 1016T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
32562322046 0 037539 820 1016T:refclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
32751122795 0 039939 820 1016T:refclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625
34651021445 0 035745 812 1016T:refclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024070320240625

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c:77:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.
silc.c: silc.c:39:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:         pstate2("processing nonce:", NULL);
silc.c:         ^
silc.c: silc.c:101:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring message block:", es);
silc.c:                         ^
silc.c: silc.c:106:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring ciphertext block:", es);
silc.c:                         ^
silc.c: silc.c:110:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                 pstate2("tag state:", ts);
silc.c:                 ^
silc.c: silc.c:127:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring last partial message block:", es);
silc.c:                         ^
silc.c: silc.c:132:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring last partial ciphertext block:", es);
silc.c:                         ^
silc.c: silc.c:136:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                 pstate2("tag state:", ts);
silc.c:                 ^
silc.c: silc.c:147:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:         pstate2("After xoring the legnth of message:", ts);
silc.c:         ^
silc.c: 8 warnings generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_aes128n12silcv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    72 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:77:2: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    77 |  return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |  ^~~~~~
silc.c: silc.c: In function 'process_ad':
silc.c: silc.c:39:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2'; did you mean 'pstate'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:    39 |  pstate2("processing nonce:", NULL);
silc.c:       |  ^~~~~~~
silc.c:       |  pstate

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)