Implementation notes: amd64, lucienne, crypto_aead/flexaead256b128v12

Computer: lucienne
Microarchitecture: amd64; Zen 2 (860f81)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: AuthenticAMD-00860f81-178bfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20240625
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: flexaead256b128v12

Time	Object size	Test size	Implementation	Compiler	Benchmark date	SUPERCOP version
242534	19868 0 0	36224 780 1080	`T:opt1`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
255613	11380 0 0	26080 780 1080	`T:opt1`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
256230	10196 0 0	24479 772 1080	`T:opt1`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
266865	7482 0 0	20563 756 1048	`T:opt1`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
270773	7937 0 0	21918 804 1016	`T:opt1`	`clang_-march=native_-O_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
275701	17782 0 0	34216 812 1016	`T:opt1`	`clang_-mcpu=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
275916	15128 0 0	31240 812 1048	`T:ref`	`clang_-march=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
276270	15048 0 0	31032 812 1048	`T:ref`	`clang_-march=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
301848	18126 0 0	33880 812 1048	`T:opt1`	`clang_-march=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
304562	13195 0 0	29224 812 1048	`T:opt1`	`clang_-march=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
314493	9525 0 0	23872 780 1080	`T:ref`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
317913	10454 0 0	25160 780 1080	`T:ref`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
326352	18936 0 0	35360 812 1016	`T:ref`	`clang_-mcpu=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
336854	8603 0 0	22262 804 1016	`T:ref`	`clang_-march=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
339700	6833 0 0	20806 804 1016	`T:ref`	`clang_-march=native_-O_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
373489	8956 0 0	22630 804 1016	`T:opt1`	`clang_-march=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
420383	6023 0 0	19091 756 1048	`T:ref`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c:777:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         dirPFK( block, (*self).nBytes, ((*self).subkeys + SUBKEY0),  (*self).nRounds, (*self).state );
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:774:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for( unsigned i = 0; i<(*self).nBytes; i+=8)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:799:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         invPFK( block, (*self).nBytes, ((*self).subkeys + SUBKEY1),  (*self).nRounds, (*self).state );
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:796:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for( unsigned i = 0; i<(*self).nBytes; i+=8)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 2 warnings generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`

Compiler output

encrypt.c: In function 'dirShuffleLayer',
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirPFK' at encrypt.c:631:3,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'sumAD.constprop' at encrypt.c:745:5:
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:585:20: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
encrypt.c:   585 |   *(state+(2*i+0)) = *(block+(0*(blocklen/2)+i));
encrypt.c:       |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'sumAD.constprop':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:48:18: note: at offset 0 to object 'state' with size 16 declared here
encrypt.c:    48 |    unsigned char state[BLOCKSIZE];
encrypt.c:       |                  ^~~~~
encrypt.c: In function 'dirShuffleLayer',
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirPFK' at encrypt.c:631:3,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'sumAD.constprop' at encrypt.c:745:5:
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:586:20: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
encrypt.c:   586 |   *(state+(2*i+1)) = *(block+(1*(blocklen/2)+i));
encrypt.c:       |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'sumAD.constprop':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:48:18: note: at offset 0 to object 'state' with size 16 declared here
encrypt.c:    48 |    unsigned char state[BLOCKSIZE];
encrypt.c:       |                  ^~~~~
encrypt.c: In function 'dirShuffleLayer',
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirPFK' at encrypt.c:631:3,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'sumAD.constprop' at encrypt.c:745:5:
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:585:20: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
encrypt.c:   585 |   *(state+(2*i+0)) = *(block+(0*(blocklen/2)+i));
encrypt.c: ...

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 1, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)`