Implementation notes: amd64, lucienne, crypto_aead/flexaead128b128v12

Computer: lucienne
Microarchitecture: amd64; Zen 2 (860f81)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: AuthenticAMD-00860f81-178bfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20240625
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: flexaead128b128v12
TimeObject sizeTest sizeImplementationCompilerBenchmark dateSUPERCOP version
25452011495 0 025759 772 1080T:opt1gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
26009311332 0 026016 780 1080T:opt1gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
27238614358 0 030792 812 1016T:opt1clang_-mcpu=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
2729047428 0 020499 756 1048T:opt1gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
2753257873 0 021854 804 1016T:opt1clang_-march=native_-O_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
27819311304 0 027288 812 1048T:refclang_-march=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
28134411384 0 027496 812 1048T:refclang_-march=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
29837514110 0 030264 812 1048T:opt1clang_-march=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
3002719971 0 023630 804 1016T:opt1clang_-march=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
30444014075 0 030104 812 1048T:opt1clang_-march=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
3185459487 0 023824 780 1080T:refgcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
32054410438 0 025128 780 1080T:refgcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
3253789299 0 022950 804 1016T:refclang_-march=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
32776115112 0 031536 812 1016T:refclang_-mcpu=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
3398616769 0 020742 804 1016T:refclang_-march=native_-O_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
4237966002 0 019059 756 1048T:refgcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625

Checksum failure


473bea2889cd672c502ba6a3e10590ce01f4f0199e88efb19482052642a7471c

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 1, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:opt1gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c:777:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         dirPFK( block, (*self).nBytes, ((*self).subkeys + SUBKEY0),  (*self).nRounds, (*self).state );
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:774:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for( unsigned i = 0; i<(*self).nBytes; i+=8)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:799:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         invPFK( block, (*self).nBytes, ((*self).subkeys + SUBKEY1),  (*self).nRounds, (*self).state );
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:796:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for( unsigned i = 0; i<(*self).nBytes; i+=8)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 2 warnings generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)

Compiler output


encrypt.c: In function 'dirShuffleLayer',
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirPFK' at encrypt.c:631:3,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'sumAD.constprop' at encrypt.c:745:5:
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:585:20: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
encrypt.c:   585 |   *(state+(2*i+0)) = *(block+(0*(blocklen/2)+i));
encrypt.c:       |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'sumAD.constprop':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:48:18: note: at offset 0 to object 'state' with size 16 declared here
encrypt.c:    48 |    unsigned char state[BLOCKSIZE];
encrypt.c:       |                  ^~~~~
encrypt.c: In function 'dirShuffleLayer',
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirPFK' at encrypt.c:631:3,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'sumAD.constprop' at encrypt.c:745:5:
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:586:20: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
encrypt.c:   586 |   *(state+(2*i+1)) = *(block+(1*(blocklen/2)+i));
encrypt.c:       |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'sumAD.constprop':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:48:18: note: at offset 0 to object 'state' with size 16 declared here
encrypt.c:    48 |    unsigned char state[BLOCKSIZE];
encrypt.c:       |                  ^~~~~
encrypt.c: In function 'dirShuffleLayer',
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirPFK' at encrypt.c:631:3,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'sumAD.constprop' at encrypt.c:745:5:
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:585:20: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
encrypt.c:   585 |   *(state+(2*i+0)) = *(block+(0*(blocklen/2)+i));
encrypt.c: ...

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 1, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)