Implementation notes: amd64, hydra7, crypto_aead/present80n6t4silcv3

Computer: hydra7
Microarchitecture: amd64; Sandy Bridge+AES (206a7)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-000206a7-bfebfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20240625
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: present80n6t4silcv3

Time	Object size	Test size	Implementation	Compiler	Benchmark date	SUPERCOP version
494182	5455 752 512	22004 1572 1600	`T:vperm`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
494923	5149 752 512	20476 1572 1600	`T:vperm`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
1195615	4467 752 512	18111 1548 1568	`T:vperm`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
1196495	4785 752 512	19747 1564 1600	`T:vperm`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
32060706	5142 0 0	21623 812 1088	`T:ref`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
35566800	3187 0 0	18415 812 1088	`T:ref`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
35987001	3084 0 0	17836 796 1088	`T:ref`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625
39169167	2689 0 0	16218 788 1056	`T:ref`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240626	20240625

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_present80n6t4silcv3_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:65:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    65 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:70:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    70 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)`

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_present80n6t4silcv3_vperm_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:65:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    65 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:70:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    70 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~
silc.c: silc.c: In function 'ae_decrypt':
silc.c: silc.c:190:12: warning: unused variable 'tmpState' [-Wunused-variable]
silc.c:   190 |     dqword tmpState;
silc.c:       |            ^~~~~~~~

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:vperm`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)`
`T:vperm`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)`
`T:vperm`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)`
`T:vperm`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)`