Implementation notes: amd64, hydra7, crypto_aead/led80n6t4silcv2

Computer: hydra7
Microarchitecture: amd64; Sandy Bridge+AES (206a7)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-000206a7-bfebfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20240625
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: led80n6t4silcv2
TimeObject sizeTest sizeImplementationCompilerBenchmark dateSUPERCOP version
593317127232 4 423735 816 1120T:refgcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
1127070764347 4 419599 816 1120T:refgcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
1180504034226 4 419004 800 1120T:refgcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625
2620793033623 4 417218 792 1088T:refgcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062620240625

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_led80n6t4silcv2_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:63:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    63 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:68:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    68 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)