Test results for amd64, hydra5, crypto_aead/twine80n6t4clocv2

[Page version: 20241023 11:53:17]

Measurements for amd64, hydra5, crypto_aead Test results for amd64, hydra5, crypto_aead Test results for crypto_aead/twine80n6t4clocv2
Computer: hydra5
Microarchitecture: amd64; K10 32nm (300f10)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: AuthenticAMD-00300f10-178bfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20241022
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: twine80n6t4clocv2
TimeObject sizeTest sizeImplementationCompilerBenchmark dateSUPERCOP version
15095117766 0 30424274 868 1344T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024071920240716
15975187766 0 30424274 868 1344T:refclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024071920240716
18796877998 0 30423610 868 1344T:refclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024071920240716
20935688836 0 29225869 804 1408T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024071920240716
21302227791 0 29223461 804 1408T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024071920240716
23056306179 0 30419450 852 1344T:refclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024071920240716
26695216381 0 29219856 780 1376T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024071920240716
27187606508 0 30420658 868 1344T:refclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024071920240716
27442877263 0 29221988 796 1408T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024071920240716

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c:66:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:61:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:refclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:refclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:refclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_twine80n6t4clocv2_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:61:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    61 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:66:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    66 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~
twine.c: twine.c: In function 'Keyschedule':
twine.c: twine.c:493:17: warning: 'Keyschedule128' reading 32 bytes from a region of size 16 [-Wstringop-overread]
twine.c:   493 |                 Keyschedule128(sk);
twine.c:       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
twine.c: twine.c:493:17: note: referencing argument 1 of type 'const uint8 *' {aka 'const unsigned char *'}
twine.c: twine.c:359:6: note: in a call to function 'Keyschedule128'
twine.c:   359 | void Keyschedule128(const uint8 sk[128/4])
twine.c:       |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)

Compiler output


encrypt.c: In file included from encrypt.c:3:
encrypt.c: ./twine.h:227:15: error: always_inline function '_mm_shuffle_epi8' requires target feature 'ssse3', but would be inlined into function 'Encode' that is compiled without support for 'ssse3'
encrypt.c:         word state = LOADS(text);
encrypt.c:                      ^
encrypt.c: ./twine.h:76:26: note: expanded from macro 'LOADS'
encrypt.c: #define LOADS(p)         SHUFFLE4(LOAD64(p))             /* load 64-bit word from memory address p, and shuffle it */
encrypt.c:                          ^
encrypt.c: ./twine.h:81:3: note: expanded from macro 'SHUFFLE4'
encrypt.c:                 _mm_shuffle_epi8(MASK4L(x), _mm_set_epi8(7, -1, 6, -1, 5, -1, 4, -1, 3, -1, 2, -1, 1, -1, 0, -1)),  \
encrypt.c:                 ^
encrypt.c: ./twine.h:227:15: error: always_inline function '_mm_shuffle_epi8' requires target feature 'ssse3', but would be inlined into function 'Encode' that is compiled without support for 'ssse3'
encrypt.c: ./twine.h:76:26: note: expanded from macro 'LOADS'
encrypt.c: #define LOADS(p)         SHUFFLE4(LOAD64(p))             /* load 64-bit word from memory address p, and shuffle it */
encrypt.c:                          ^
encrypt.c: ./twine.h:82:3: note: expanded from macro 'SHUFFLE4'
encrypt.c:                 _mm_shuffle_epi8(SHR4(MASK4U(x)), _mm_set_epi8(-1, 7, -1, 6, -1, 5, -1, 4, -1, 3, -1, 2, -1, 1, -1, 0)))
encrypt.c:                 ^
encrypt.c: ./twine.h:228:2: error: always_inline function '_mm_shuffle_epi8' requires target feature 'ssse3', but would be inlined into function 'Encode' that is compiled without support for 'ssse3'
encrypt.c:         twine80_enc(state);
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: ./twine.h:163:9: note: expanded from macro 'twine80_enc'
encrypt.c:         left = PSHUFB(state, left);                             \
encrypt.c:                ^
encrypt.c: ./twine.h:70:25: note: expanded from macro 'PSHUFB'
encrypt.c: #define PSHUFB(s,x)     _mm_shuffle_epi8((s), (x))                  /* return s(x) */
encrypt.c: ...

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:vpermclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:vpermclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:vpermclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:vpermclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:vpermclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_twine80n6t4clocv2_vperm_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:334:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:   334 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:339:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:   339 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~
encrypt.c: In file included from twine.h:7,
encrypt.c:                  from encrypt.c:3:
encrypt.c: twine.h: In function 'Encode':
encrypt.c: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/include/tmmintrin.h:136:1: error: inlining failed in call to 'always_inline' '_mm_shuffle_epi8': target specific option mismatch
encrypt.c:   136 | _mm_shuffle_epi8 (__m128i __X, __m128i __Y)
encrypt.c:       | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
encrypt.c: In file included from encrypt.c:3:
encrypt.c: twine.h:70:25: note: called from here
encrypt.c:    70 | #define PSHUFB(s,x)     _mm_shuffle_epi8((s), (x))                  /* return s(x) */
encrypt.c:       |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
encrypt.c: twine.h:174:16: note: in expansion of macro 'PSHUFB'
encrypt.c:   174 |         _tmp = PSHUFB(state, _tmp);                             \
encrypt.c:       |                ^~~~~~
encrypt.c: twine.h:228:9: note: in expansion of macro 'twine80_enc'
encrypt.c:   228 |         twine80_enc(state);
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~
encrypt.c: In file included from twine.h:7,
encrypt.c:                  from encrypt.c:3:
encrypt.c: ...

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)
T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)
T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)
T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)

Namespace violations


cloc.o ae_encrypt T
cloc.o ae_init T
cloc.o process_ad T
twine.o CON_H R
twine.o CON_L R
twine.o Decode T
twine.o Encode T
twine.o Keyschedule T
twine.o Keyschedule128 T
twine.o Keyschedule80 T
twine.o S R
twine.o ek B
twine.o pstate3 T
twine.o pswitch B
utils.o print_cxt T
utils.o pstate T
utils.o pstate2 T
utils.o xor_bytes T
utils.o xor_bytes2 T

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 9, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:refclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:refclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:refclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)