Implementation notes: amd64, hydra4, crypto_aead/flexaead256b128v12

Computer: hydra4
Microarchitecture: amd64; K10 32nm (300f10)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: AuthenticAMD-00300f10-178bfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20240716
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: flexaead256b128v12

Time	Object size	Test size	Implementation	Compiler	Benchmark date	SUPERCOP version
529493	17384 0 0	33496 780 1080	`T:opt1`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240629	20240625
562825	13347 0 0	28936 812 1016	`T:opt1`	`clang_-march=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240629	20240625
565119	17782 0 0	34232 812 1016	`T:opt1`	`clang_-march=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240629	20240625
565257	17782 0 0	34232 812 1016	`T:opt1`	`clang_-mcpu=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240629	20240625
572073	11382 0 0	26328 780 1080	`T:opt1`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240629	20240625
582556	10238 0 0	24511 772 1080	`T:opt1`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240629	20240625
586724	8744 0 0	22214 804 1016	`T:opt1`	`clang_-march=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240629	20240625
603980	7906 0 0	21998 804 1016	`T:opt1`	`clang_-march=native_-O_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240629	20240625
692713	7482 0 0	20571 756 1048	`T:opt1`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240629	20240625
718490	8651 0 0	22134 804 1016	`T:ref`	`clang_-march=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240629	20240625
724719	6866 0 0	20950 804 1016	`T:ref`	`clang_-march=native_-O_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240629	20240625
729172	18936 0 0	35376 812 1016	`T:ref`	`clang_-march=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240629	20240625
729331	18936 0 0	35376 812 1016	`T:ref`	`clang_-mcpu=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240629	20240625
730116	9619 0 0	23952 780 1080	`T:ref`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240629	20240625
731316	18904 0 0	34480 812 1016	`T:ref`	`clang_-march=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240629	20240625
747593	10692 0 0	25688 780 1080	`T:ref`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240629	20240625
761992	6004 0 0	19083 756 1048	`T:ref`	`gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall`	20240629	20240625

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c:777:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         dirPFK( block, (*self).nBytes, ((*self).subkeys + SUBKEY0),  (*self).nRounds, (*self).state );
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:774:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for( unsigned i = 0; i<(*self).nBytes; i+=8)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:799:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         invPFK( block, (*self).nBytes, ((*self).subkeys + SUBKEY1),  (*self).nRounds, (*self).state );
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:796:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for( unsigned i = 0; i<(*self).nBytes; i+=8)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 2 warnings generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`

Compiler output

encrypt.c: In function 'dirShuffleLayer',
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirPFK' at encrypt.c:631:3,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'sumAD.constprop' at encrypt.c:745:5:
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:585:20: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
encrypt.c:   585 |   *(state+(2*i+0)) = *(block+(0*(blocklen/2)+i));
encrypt.c:       |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'sumAD.constprop':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:48:18: note: at offset 0 to object 'state' with size 16 declared here
encrypt.c:    48 |    unsigned char state[BLOCKSIZE];
encrypt.c:       |                  ^~~~~
encrypt.c: In function 'dirShuffleLayer',
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirPFK' at encrypt.c:631:3,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'sumAD.constprop' at encrypt.c:745:5:
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:586:20: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
encrypt.c:   586 |   *(state+(2*i+1)) = *(block+(1*(blocklen/2)+i));
encrypt.c:       |   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'sumAD.constprop':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:48:18: note: at offset 0 to object 'state' with size 16 declared here
encrypt.c:    48 |    unsigned char state[BLOCKSIZE];
encrypt.c:       |                  ^~~~~
encrypt.c: In function 'dirShuffleLayer',
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirPFK' at encrypt.c:631:3,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'sumAD.constprop' at encrypt.c:745:5:
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:585:20: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
encrypt.c:   585 |   *(state+(2*i+0)) = *(block+(0*(blocklen/2)+i));
encrypt.c: ...

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 1, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)`