Test results for amd64, hertz, crypto_aead/twine80n6t4clocv2

[Page version: 20241028 01:32:29]

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_twine80n6t4clocv2_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:61:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    61 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:66:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    66 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~
twine.c: twine.c: In function 'Keyschedule':
twine.c: twine.c:493:17: warning: 'Keyschedule128' reading 32 bytes from a region of size 16 [-Wstringop-overread]
twine.c:   493 |                 Keyschedule128(sk);
twine.c:       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
twine.c: twine.c:493:17: note: referencing argument 1 of type 'const uint8[32]' {aka 'const unsigned char[32]'}
twine.c: twine.c:359:6: note: in a call to function 'Keyschedule128'
twine.c:   359 | void Keyschedule128(const uint8 sk[128/4])
twine.c:       |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c:66:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    66 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:61:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:    61 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_twine80n6t4clocv2_vperm_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:334:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:   334 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:339:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:   339 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c:339:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:   339 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:334:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:   334 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.

Namespace violations

cloc.o ae_encrypt T
cloc.o ae_init T
cloc.o process_ad T
twine.o CON_H R
twine.o CON_L R
twine.o Decode T
twine.o Encode T
twine.o Keyschedule T
twine.o Keyschedule128 T
twine.o Keyschedule80 T
twine.o S R
twine.o ek B
twine.o pstate3 T
twine.o pswitch B
utils.o print_cxt T
utils.o pstate T
utils.o pstate2 T
utils.o xor_bytes T
utils.o xor_bytes2 T

Namespace violations

encrypt.o CON_H R
encrypt.o CON_L R
encrypt.o Encode T
encrypt.o Keyschedule80 T
encrypt.o S R
encrypt.o _tmp B
encrypt.o ek B
encrypt.o load_partial_block T
encrypt.o lsbox B
encrypt.o pstate_local T
encrypt.o pstate_local2 T
encrypt.o rks B
encrypt.o shuffle_const R
encrypt.o store_partial_block T
encrypt.o twine80_const R
encrypt.o usbox B