Test results for amd64, h8bobcat, crypto_hash/bblake512
[Page version: 20240912 08:46:28]
Measurements for amd64, h8bobcat, crypto_hash
Test results for amd64, h8bobcat, crypto_hash
Test results for crypto_hash/bblake512
Computer: h8bobcat
Microarchitecture: amd64; Bobcat (500f10)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: AuthenticAMD-00500f20-178bfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20240909
Operation: crypto_hash
Primitive: bblake512
Compiler output
hash.c: hash.c:81:8: error: always_inline function '_mm_perm_epi8' requires target feature 'xop', but would be inlined into function 'blake512_compress' that is compiled without support for 'xop'
hash.c: m0 = BSWAP64(m0);
hash.c: ^
hash.c: ./rounds.h:13:21: note: expanded from macro 'BSWAP64'
hash.c: #define BSWAP64(x) _mm_perm_epi8((x),(x),u8to64)
hash.c: ^
hash.c: hash.c:82:8: error: always_inline function '_mm_perm_epi8' requires target feature 'xop', but would be inlined into function 'blake512_compress' that is compiled without support for 'xop'
hash.c: m1 = BSWAP64(m1);
hash.c: ^
hash.c: ./rounds.h:13:21: note: expanded from macro 'BSWAP64'
hash.c: #define BSWAP64(x) _mm_perm_epi8((x),(x),u8to64)
hash.c: ^
hash.c: hash.c:83:8: error: always_inline function '_mm_perm_epi8' requires target feature 'xop', but would be inlined into function 'blake512_compress' that is compiled without support for 'xop'
hash.c: m2 = BSWAP64(m2);
hash.c: ^
hash.c: ./rounds.h:13:21: note: expanded from macro 'BSWAP64'
hash.c: #define BSWAP64(x) _mm_perm_epi8((x),(x),u8to64)
hash.c: ^
hash.c: hash.c:84:8: error: always_inline function '_mm_perm_epi8' requires target feature 'xop', but would be inlined into function 'blake512_compress' that is compiled without support for 'xop'
hash.c: m3 = BSWAP64(m3);
hash.c: ^
hash.c: ./rounds.h:13:21: note: expanded from macro 'BSWAP64'
hash.c: #define BSWAP64(x) _mm_perm_epi8((x),(x),u8to64)
hash.c: ^
hash.c: hash.c:85:8: error: always_inline function '_mm_perm_epi8' requires target feature 'xop', but would be inlined into function 'blake512_compress' that is compiled without support for 'xop'
hash.c: ...
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:xop | clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:xop | clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:xop | clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:xop | clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:xop | clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
Compiler output
hash.c: In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/include/x86intrin.h:38,
hash.c: from hash.c:5:
hash.c: hash.c: In function 'blake512_compress':
hash.c: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/include/xopintrin.h:272:1: error: inlining failed in call to 'always_inline' '_mm_roti_epi64': target specific option mismatch
hash.c: 272 | _mm_roti_epi64(__m128i __A, const int __B)
hash.c: | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
hash.c: In file included from hash.c:8:
hash.c: rounds.h:1978:11: note: called from here
hash.c: 1978 | row2h = _mm_roti_epi64(row2h, -11); \
hash.c: | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
hash.c: rounds.h:2136:3: note: in expansion of macro 'G2'
hash.c: 2136 | G2(row1l,row2l,row3l,row4l,row1h,row2h,row3h,row4h,b0,b1); \
hash.c: | ^~
hash.c: hash.c:132:3: note: in expansion of macro 'ROUND'
hash.c: 132 | ROUND(15);
hash.c: | ^~~~~
hash.c: In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/include/x86intrin.h:38,
hash.c: from hash.c:5:
hash.c: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/include/xopintrin.h:272:1: error: inlining failed in call to 'always_inline' '_mm_roti_epi64': target specific option mismatch
hash.c: 272 | _mm_roti_epi64(__m128i __A, const int __B)
hash.c: | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
hash.c: In file included from hash.c:8:
hash.c: rounds.h:1977:11: note: called from here
hash.c: 1977 | row2l = _mm_roti_epi64(row2l, -11); \
hash.c: | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
hash.c: ...
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:xop | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:xop | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:xop | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:xop | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |