Test results for amd64, h8atom, crypto_aead/led80n6t4silcv2

[Page version: 20241027 17:23:40]

Measurements for amd64, h8atom, crypto_aead Test results for amd64, h8atom, crypto_aead Test results for crypto_aead/led80n6t4silcv2

Computer: h8atom
Microarchitecture: amd64; Bonnell (30661)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-00030661-bfebfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20241022
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: led80n6t4silcv2

Time	Object size	Test size	Implementation	Compiler	Benchmark date	SUPERCOP version
54740861	5651 4 4	21740 820 864	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240630	20240625
55640893	6301 4 4	22324 820 864	`T:ref`	`clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240630	20240625
101660916	6160 4 4	21084 820 864	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240630	20240625
111523447	6816 4 4	23008 788 936	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240630	20240625
221375819	3427 4 4	16374 812 856	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240630	20240625
221638508	4271 4 4	18036 820 864	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240630	20240625
225591177	4370 4 4	19224 788 936	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240630	20240625
251981618	4227 4 4	18517 772 936	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240630	20240625
446098457	3623 4 4	16715 764 904	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240630	20240625

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c:68:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:63:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)`
`T:ref`	`clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)`

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_led80n6t4silcv2_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:63:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    63 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:68:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    68 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)`