Test results for amd64, h8atom, crypto_aead/led80n6silcv1
[Page version: 20240912 08:39:10]
Measurements for amd64, h8atom, crypto_aead
Test results for amd64, h8atom, crypto_aead
Test results for crypto_aead/led80n6silcv1
Computer: h8atom
Microarchitecture: amd64; Bonnell (30661)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-00030661-bfebfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20240909
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: led80n6silcv1
Time | Object size | Test size | Implementation | Compiler | Benchmark date | SUPERCOP version |
54647572 | 5600 4 4 | 21684 820 864 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240630 | 20240625 |
55578341 | 6247 4 4 | 22268 820 864 | T:ref | clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240630 | 20240625 |
101698156 | 6125 4 4 | 21044 820 864 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240630 | 20240625 |
111530265 | 6823 4 4 | 23016 788 936 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240630 | 20240625 |
216696879 | 4235 4 4 | 17996 820 864 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240630 | 20240625 |
225486555 | 4354 4 4 | 19200 788 936 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240630 | 20240625 |
227113026 | 3424 4 4 | 16366 812 856 | T:ref | clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240630 | 20240625 |
245767095 | 4221 4 4 | 18509 772 936 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240630 | 20240625 |
455500353 | 3611 4 4 | 16715 764 904 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240630 | 20240625 |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:67:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c: for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_led80n6silcv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:67:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: 67 | for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: | ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c: 72 | return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: | ^~~~~~
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |