Test results for amd64, h8atom, crypto_aead/aes128n12clocv1
[Page version: 20241027 17:23:40]
Measurements for amd64, h8atom, crypto_aead
Test results for amd64, h8atom, crypto_aead
Test results for crypto_aead/aes128n12clocv1
Computer: h8atom
Microarchitecture: amd64; Bonnell (30661)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-00030661-bfebfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20241022
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: aes128n12clocv1
Time | Object size | Test size | Implementation | Compiler | Benchmark date | SUPERCOP version |
347403 | 20534 0 0 | 33721 816 856 | T:ref | clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240629 | 20240625 |
387163 | 21810 0 0 | 37007 824 856 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240629 | 20240625 |
402507 | 22773 0 0 | 39151 824 856 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240629 | 20240625 |
441021 | 21596 0 0 | 35607 824 856 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240629 | 20240625 |
447335 | 25135 0 0 | 41285 784 928 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240629 | 20240625 |
456617 | 21729 0 0 | 36533 784 928 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240629 | 20240625 |
468272 | 22564 0 0 | 38831 824 856 | T:ref | clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240629 | 20240625 |
470064 | 20975 0 0 | 34040 760 896 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240629 | 20240625 |
565313 | 21943 0 0 | 36308 776 928 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240629 | 20240625 |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:78:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:73:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c: for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_aes128n12clocv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:73:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: 73 | for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: | ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:78:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c: 78 | return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: | ^~~~~~
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |