Test results for amd64, h3neo, crypto_aead/present80n6t4silcv3
[Page version: 20241105 13:30:20]
Measurements for amd64, h3neo, crypto_aead
Test results for amd64, h3neo, crypto_aead
Test results for crypto_aead/present80n6t4silcv3
Computer: h3neo
Microarchitecture: amd64; K10 45nm (100f63)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: AuthenticAMD-00100f63-078bfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20241022
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: present80n6t4silcv3
Time | Object size | Test size | Implementation | Compiler | Benchmark date | SUPERCOP version |
37803834 | 5017 0 0 | 22023 812 1088 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240705 | 20240625 |
40341067 | 4023 0 0 | 20403 844 1024 | T:ref | clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240705 | 20240625 |
40392201 | 3480 0 0 | 18347 844 1024 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240705 | 20240625 |
40393786 | 3549 0 0 | 19331 844 1024 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240705 | 20240625 |
43953766 | 2398 0 0 | 15613 836 1024 | T:ref | clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240705 | 20240625 |
44602616 | 2595 0 0 | 16507 844 1024 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240705 | 20240625 |
45054316 | 3224 0 0 | 18927 812 1088 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240705 | 20240625 |
45361524 | 3071 0 0 | 17732 796 1088 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240705 | 20240625 |
99724110 | 2690 0 0 | 16202 788 1056 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240705 | 20240625 |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:70:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:65:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c: for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_present80n6t4silcv3_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:65:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: 65 | for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: | ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:70:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c: 70 | return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: | ^~~~~~
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:70:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:65:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c: for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.
present.c: present.c:112:15: error: always_inline function '_mm_shuffle_epi8' requires target feature 'ssse3', but would be inlined into function 'format_input' that is compiled without support for 'ssse3'
present.c: dqword tmp = PSHUFB(*state, LOAD(PRESENTInShuffleU));
present.c: ^
present.c: ./common.h:40:22: note: expanded from macro 'PSHUFB'
present.c: #define PSHUFB(s, x) _mm_shuffle_epi8((s), (x)) /*return s(x)*/
present.c: ^
present.c: present.c:113:11: error: always_inline function '_mm_shuffle_epi8' requires target feature 'ssse3', but would be inlined into function 'format_input' that is compiled without support for 'ssse3'
present.c: *state = PSHUFB(*state, LOAD(PRESENTInShuffleL));
present.c: ^
present.c: ./common.h:40:22: note: expanded from macro 'PSHUFB'
present.c: #define PSHUFB(s, x) _mm_shuffle_epi8((s), (x)) /*return s(x)*/
present.c: ^
present.c: 2 errors generated.
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:vperm | clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:vperm | clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:vperm | clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:vperm | clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:vperm | clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_present80n6t4silcv3_vperm_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:65:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: 65 | for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: | ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:70:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c: 70 | return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: | ^~~~~~
present.c: In file included from common.h:7,
present.c: from present.h:1,
present.c: from present.c:1:
present.c: present.c: In function 'format_input':
present.c: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/include/tmmintrin.h:136:1: error: inlining failed in call to 'always_inline' '_mm_shuffle_epi8': target specific option mismatch
present.c: 136 | _mm_shuffle_epi8 (__m128i __X, __m128i __Y)
present.c: | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
present.c: In file included from present.h:1,
present.c: from present.c:1:
present.c: common.h:40:25: note: called from here
present.c: 40 | #define PSHUFB(s, x) _mm_shuffle_epi8((s), (x)) /*return s(x)*/
present.c: | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
present.c: present.c:113:18: note: in expansion of macro 'PSHUFB'
present.c: 113 | *state = PSHUFB(*state, LOAD(PRESENTInShuffleL));
present.c: | ^~~~~~
present.c: In file included from common.h:7,
present.c: from present.h:1,
present.c: from present.c:1:
present.c: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/include/tmmintrin.h:136:1: error: inlining failed in call to 'always_inline' '_mm_shuffle_epi8': target specific option mismatch
present.c: 136 | _mm_shuffle_epi8 (__m128i __X, __m128i __Y)
present.c: | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
present.c: In file included from present.h:1,
present.c: from present.c:1:
present.c: common.h:40:25: note: called from here
present.c: 40 | #define PSHUFB(s, x) _mm_shuffle_epi8((s), (x)) /*return s(x)*/
present.c: ...
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:vperm | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:vperm | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:vperm | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:vperm | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |