Test results for amd64, h3neo, crypto_aead/aes128n12clocv1
[Page version: 20241105 13:30:20]
Measurements for amd64, h3neo, crypto_aead
Test results for amd64, h3neo, crypto_aead
Test results for crypto_aead/aes128n12clocv1
Computer: h3neo
Microarchitecture: amd64; K10 45nm (100f63)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: AuthenticAMD-00100f63-078bfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20241022
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: aes128n12clocv1
Time | Object size | Test size | Implementation | Compiler | Benchmark date | SUPERCOP version |
163018 | 21881 0 0 | 37556 812 1088 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240703 | 20240625 |
163123 | 24999 0 0 | 42012 812 1088 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240703 | 20240625 |
164554 | 20277 0 0 | 33800 844 1024 | T:ref | clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240703 | 20240625 |
168942 | 20945 0 0 | 34503 788 1056 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240703 | 20240625 |
183461 | 22077 0 0 | 36867 804 1088 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240703 | 20240625 |
183847 | 21985 0 0 | 38070 852 1024 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240703 | 20240625 |
184645 | 21166 0 0 | 36334 852 1024 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240703 | 20240625 |
187184 | 20777 0 0 | 34998 852 1024 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240703 | 20240625 |
190461 | 22564 0 0 | 39246 852 1024 | T:ref | clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240703 | 20240625 |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:78:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:73:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c: for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_aes128n12clocv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:73:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: 73 | for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: | ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:78:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c: 78 | return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: | ^~~~~~
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |