Test results for amd64, gemini, crypto_aead/twine80n6clocv1

[Page version: 20241028 05:30:40]

Measurements for amd64, gemini, crypto_aead Test results for amd64, gemini, crypto_aead Test results for crypto_aead/twine80n6clocv1

Computer: gemini
Microarchitecture: amd64; Goldmont Plus (706a8)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-000706a8-bfebfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20241022
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: twine80n6clocv1

Time	Object size	Test size	Implementation	Compiler	Benchmark date	SUPERCOP version
938006	6710 0 288	21311 788 1368	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
946478	8826 0 288	24631 788 1368	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
970002	6484 0 288	20654 780 1368	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
1086139	7292 0 288	23731 820 1304	`T:ref`	`clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
1105762	6755 0 288	22171 820 1304	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
1107136	7077 0 288	24803 820 1304	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
1155776	6244 0 288	19777 812 1304	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
1219813	6485 0 288	20577 812 1304	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625
1637881	5815 0 288	18826 764 1336	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240703	20240625

Compiler output

cloc.c: cloc.c:64:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c:                 pstate2("After xoring associated data:", state);
cloc.c:                 ^
cloc.c: cloc.c:72:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c:                 pstate2("After processing last partial associated data block:", state);
cloc.c:                 ^
cloc.c: cloc.c:93:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c:         pstate2("After applying f1/f2 to state:", state);
cloc.c:         ^
cloc.c: cloc.c:133:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring message block:", es);
cloc.c:                         ^
cloc.c: cloc.c:138:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring ciphertext block:", es);
cloc.c:                         ^
cloc.c: cloc.c:145:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c:                 pstate2("After applying fix1:", es);
cloc.c:                 ^
cloc.c: cloc.c:154:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c:                 pstate2("After xoring last partial message block:", es);
cloc.c:                 ^
cloc.c: cloc.c:159:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c:                 pstate2("After xoring last partial ciphertext block:", es);
cloc.c:                 ^
cloc.c: cloc.c:163:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c: ...
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:76:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:71:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`

Compiler output

cloc.c: cloc.c: In function 'process_ad':
cloc.c: cloc.c:64:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2'; did you mean 'pstate'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c:    64 |   pstate2("After xoring associated data:", state);
cloc.c:       |   ^~~~~~~
cloc.c:       |   pstate
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_twine80n6clocv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:71:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    71 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:76:2: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    76 |  return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |  ^~~~~~

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)`