Test results for amd64, gemini, crypto_aead/present80n6silcv1

[Page version: 20241028 05:30:40]

Measurements for amd64, gemini, crypto_aead Test results for amd64, gemini, crypto_aead Test results for crypto_aead/present80n6silcv1

Computer: gemini
Microarchitecture: amd64; Goldmont Plus (706a8)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-000706a8-bfebfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20241022
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: present80n6silcv1

Time	Object size	Test size	Implementation	Compiler	Benchmark date	SUPERCOP version
33302317	3482 0 0	21096 812 1016	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240702	20240625
35411384	3930 0 0	20256 812 1016	`T:ref`	`clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240702	20240625
36169690	3389 0 0	18712 812 1016	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240702	20240625
37310491	2357 0 0	15782 804 1016	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240702	20240625
37668793	2590 0 0	16598 804 1016	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240702	20240625
38332948	5505 0 0	21306 788 1080	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240702	20240625
38380163	2316 0 0	15269 764 1048	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240702	20240625
39144277	2762 0 0	16839 772 1080	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240702	20240625
40211492	2797 0 0	17394 788 1080	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240702	20240625

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:67:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_present80n6silcv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:67:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    67 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:2: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    72 |  return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |  ^~~~~~

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)`