Test results for amd64, gemini, crypto_aead/led80n6t4silcv2

[Page version: 20240912 08:43:33]

Measurements for amd64, gemini, crypto_aead Test results for amd64, gemini, crypto_aead Test results for crypto_aead/led80n6t4silcv2

Computer: gemini
Microarchitecture: amd64; Goldmont Plus (706a8)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-000706a8-bfebfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20240909
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: led80n6t4silcv2

Time	Object size	Test size	Implementation	Compiler	Benchmark date	SUPERCOP version
38945792	6289 4 4	22672 816 1016	`T:ref`	`clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240702	20240625
39487000	5438 4 4	20824 816 1016	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240702	20240625
39676529	5867 4 4	23544 816 1016	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240702	20240625
63426331	8389 4 4	24210 792 1112	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240702	20240625
117242442	3855 4 4	18482 792 1112	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240702	20240625
117519080	3740 4 4	17839 776 1112	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240702	20240625
122722129	3524 4 4	17590 808 1016	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240702	20240625
128706783	3337 4 4	16822 808 1016	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240702	20240625

Test failure

error 142
Alarm clock

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 1, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)`

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c:68:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:63:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`
`T:ref`	`clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)`

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_led80n6t4silcv2_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:63:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    63 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:68:2: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    68 |  return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |  ^~~~~~

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)`