Test results for amd64, comet, crypto_aead/aes128n12silcv1

[Page version: 20241024 06:31:28]

Measurements for amd64, comet, crypto_aead Test results for amd64, comet, crypto_aead Test results for crypto_aead/aes128n12silcv1

Computer: comet
Microarchitecture: amd64; Comet Lake (806ec)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-000806ec-bfebfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20241022
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: aes128n12silcv1

Time	Object size	Test size	Implementation	Compiler	Benchmark date	SUPERCOP version
116728	24853 0 0	41237 796 1088	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240629	20240625
122140	21637 0 0	36149 796 1088	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240629	20240625
124571	23811 0 0	42200 860 1088	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240629	20240625
124757	23004 0 0	41104 860 1056	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240629	20240625
127622	23276 0 0	40048 860 1024	`T:ref`	`clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240629	20240625
130383	20959 0 0	33728 772 1056	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240629	20240625
131895	20880 0 0	35926 852 1088	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240629	20240625
135422	21619 0 0	35888 860 1024	`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240629	20240625
141092	22221 0 0	36227 788 1088	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20240629	20240625

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c:77:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.
silc.c: silc.c:39:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:         pstate2("processing nonce:", NULL);
silc.c:         ^
silc.c: silc.c:101:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring message block:", es);
silc.c:                         ^
silc.c: silc.c:106:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring ciphertext block:", es);
silc.c:                         ^
silc.c: silc.c:110:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                 pstate2("tag state:", ts);
silc.c:                 ^
silc.c: silc.c:127:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring last partial message block:", es);
silc.c:                         ^
silc.c: silc.c:132:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring last partial ciphertext block:", es);
silc.c:                         ^
silc.c: silc.c:136:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                 pstate2("tag state:", ts);
silc.c:                 ^
silc.c: silc.c:147:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:         pstate2("After xoring the legnth of message:", ts);
silc.c:         ^
silc.c: 8 warnings generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_14.0.6)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_14.0.6)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_14.0.6)`
`T:ref`	`clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_14.0.6)`
`T:ref`	`clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_14.0.6)`

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_aes128n12silcv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    72 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:77:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    77 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~
silc.c: silc.c: In function 'process_ad':
silc.c: silc.c:39:9: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2'; did you mean 'pstate'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:    39 |         pstate2("processing nonce:", NULL);
silc.c:       |         ^~~~~~~
silc.c:       |         pstate

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)`