Test results for amd64, tripwire, crypto_aead/twine80n6t4clocv2

[Page version: 20261004 16:18:08]

Measurements for amd64, tripwire, crypto_aead Test results for amd64, tripwire, crypto_aead Test results for crypto_aead/twine80n6t4clocv2
Computer: tripwire
Microarchitecture: amd64; Zen 5 (b00f21)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: AuthenticAMD-00b00f21-178bfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20260831
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: twine80n6t4clocv2
TimeObject sizeTest sizeImplementationCompilerBenchmark dateSUPERCOP version
1830458646 0 92831922 1192 2616T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2026093020260831
18318210987 0 92836239 1216 2712T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2026093020260831
18330122391 0 92852111 1216 2712T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2026093020260831
1833529784 0 92834663 1216 2648T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2026093020260831
6535117894 0 29237663 1216 2104T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2026093020260831
6567357418 0 29232671 1216 2104T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2026093020260831
8074776638 0 29231478 1208 2040T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2026093020260831
8477645862 0 29229106 1192 2008T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2026093020260831

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_twine80n6t4clocv2_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:61:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    61 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:66:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    66 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~
twine.c: twine.c: In function 'Keyschedule':
twine.c: twine.c:493:17: warning: 'Keyschedule128' reading 32 bytes from a region of size 16 [-Wstringop-overread]
twine.c:   493 |                 Keyschedule128(sk);
twine.c:       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
twine.c: twine.c:493:17: note: referencing argument 1 of type 'const uint8[32]' {aka 'const unsigned char[32]'}
twine.c: twine.c:359:6: note: in a call to function 'Keyschedule128'
twine.c:   359 | void Keyschedule128(const uint8 sk[128/4])
twine.c:       |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_twine80n6t4clocv2_vperm_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:334:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:   334 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:339:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:   339 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)
T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)
T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)
T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)

Namespace violations


cloc.o ae_encrypt T
cloc.o ae_init T
cloc.o process_ad T
twine.o CON_H R
twine.o CON_L R
twine.o Decode T
twine.o Encode T
twine.o Keyschedule T
twine.o Keyschedule128 T
twine.o Keyschedule80 T
twine.o S R
twine.o ek B
twine.o pstate3 T
twine.o pswitch B
utils.o print_cxt T
utils.o pstate T
utils.o pstate2 T
utils.o xor_bytes T
utils.o xor_bytes2 T

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)

Namespace violations


encrypt.o CON_H R
encrypt.o CON_L R
encrypt.o Encode T
encrypt.o Keyschedule80 T
encrypt.o S R
encrypt.o _tmp B
encrypt.o ek B
encrypt.o load_partial_block T
encrypt.o lsbox B
encrypt.o pstate_local T
encrypt.o pstate_local2 T
encrypt.o rks B
encrypt.o shuffle_const R
encrypt.o store_partial_block T
encrypt.o twine80_const R
encrypt.o usbox B

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)
T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)
T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)
T:vpermgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)