Implementation notes: amd64, rumba7, crypto_aead/flexaead256b256v12

Compiler output

encrypt.c: In function 'memcpyopt',
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirMixQuartersLayer' at encrypt.c:954:2,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirPFK' at encrypt.c:1423:3,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'FlexAEADv1_init' at encrypt.c:674:3:
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:697:42: warning: 'keystate' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
encrypt.c:   697 |             *((crypto_uint64 *) (a+i)) = *((crypto_uint64 *) (b+i));
encrypt.c:       |                                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'FlexAEADv1_init':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:629:23: note: 'keystate' declared here
encrypt.c:   629 |         unsigned char keystate[KEYSIZE];
encrypt.c:       |                       ^~~~~~~~
encrypt.c: In function 'memcpyopt',
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirMixQuartersLayer' at encrypt.c:954:2,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirPFK' at encrypt.c:1423:3,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'FlexAEADv1_init' at encrypt.c:674:3:
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:707:42: warning: 'keystate' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
encrypt.c:   707 |             *((crypto_uint16 *) (a+i)) = *((crypto_uint16 *) (b+i));
encrypt.c:       |                                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'FlexAEADv1_init':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:629:23: note: 'keystate' declared here
encrypt.c:   629 |         unsigned char keystate[KEYSIZE];
encrypt.c:       |                       ^~~~~~~~
encrypt.c: In function 'memcpyopt',
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirMixQuartersLayer' at encrypt.c:954:2,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirPFK' at encrypt.c:1423:3,
encrypt.c: ...

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c:777:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         dirPFK( block, (*self).nBytes, ((*self).subkeys + SUBKEY0),  (*self).nRounds, (*self).state );
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:774:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for( unsigned i = 0; i<(*self).nBytes; i+=8)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:799:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         invPFK( block, (*self).nBytes, ((*self).subkeys + SUBKEY1),  (*self).nRounds, (*self).state );
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:796:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for( unsigned i = 0; i<(*self).nBytes; i+=8)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 2 warnings generated.

Namespace violations

encrypt.o FlexAEADv1_init T
encrypt.o decryptBlock T
encrypt.o dirMixQuartersLayer T
encrypt.o dirPFK T
encrypt.o dirSBox0 R
encrypt.o dirSBox1 R
encrypt.o dirSBox2 R
encrypt.o dirSBox3 R
encrypt.o dirSBoxLayer T
encrypt.o dirShuffleLayer T
encrypt.o encryptBlock T
encrypt.o invPFK T
encrypt.o invSBox0 R
encrypt.o invSBox1 R
encrypt.o invSBox2 R
encrypt.o invSBox3 R
encrypt.o invSBoxLayer T
encrypt.o invShuffleLayer T
encrypt.o memcpyopt T
encrypt.o mwc32 T
encrypt.o padBlock T
encrypt.o sumAD T
encrypt.o unpadBlock T

Namespace violations

encrypt.o FlexAEADv1_init T
encrypt.o decryptBlock T
encrypt.o dirMixQuartersLayer T
encrypt.o dirPFK T
encrypt.o dirSBox0 R
encrypt.o dirSBox1 R
encrypt.o dirSBox2 R
encrypt.o dirSBox3 R
encrypt.o dirSBoxLayer T
encrypt.o dirShuffleLayer T
encrypt.o encryptBlock T
encrypt.o invPFK T
encrypt.o invSBox0 R
encrypt.o invSBox1 R
encrypt.o invSBox2 R
encrypt.o invSBox3 R
encrypt.o invSBoxLayer T
encrypt.o invShuffleLayer T
encrypt.o mwc32 T
encrypt.o padBlock T
encrypt.o sumAD T
encrypt.o unpadBlock T