Test results for amd64, rumba5, crypto_aead/twine80n6clocv1

[Page version: 20241022 22:27:27]

Compiler output

cloc.c: cloc.c:64:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c:                 pstate2("After xoring associated data:", state);
cloc.c:                 ^
cloc.c: cloc.c:72:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c:                 pstate2("After processing last partial associated data block:", state);
cloc.c:                 ^
cloc.c: cloc.c:93:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c:         pstate2("After applying f1/f2 to state:", state);
cloc.c:         ^
cloc.c: cloc.c:133:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring message block:", es);
cloc.c:                         ^
cloc.c: cloc.c:138:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring ciphertext block:", es);
cloc.c:                         ^
cloc.c: cloc.c:145:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c:                 pstate2("After applying fix1:", es);
cloc.c:                 ^
cloc.c: cloc.c:154:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c:                 pstate2("After xoring last partial message block:", es);
cloc.c:                 ^
cloc.c: cloc.c:159:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c:                 pstate2("After xoring last partial ciphertext block:", es);
cloc.c:                 ^
cloc.c: cloc.c:163:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c: ...

Compiler output

cloc.c: cloc.c: In function 'process_ad':
cloc.c: cloc.c:64:17: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2'; did you mean 'pstate'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cloc.c:    64 |                 pstate2("After xoring associated data:", state);
cloc.c:       |                 ^~~~~~~
cloc.c:       |                 pstate
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_twine80n6clocv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:71:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    71 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:76:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    76 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~
twine.c: twine.c: In function 'Keyschedule':
twine.c: twine.c:451:17: warning: 'Keyschedule128' reading 32 bytes from a region of size 16 [-Wstringop-overread]
twine.c:   451 |                 Keyschedule128(sk);
twine.c:       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
twine.c: twine.c:451:17: note: referencing argument 1 of type 'const uint8 *' {aka 'const unsigned char *'}
twine.c: twine.c:317:6: note: in a call to function 'Keyschedule128'
twine.c:   317 | void Keyschedule128(const uint8 sk[128/4])
twine.c:       |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Namespace violations

cloc.o ae_encrypt T
cloc.o ae_init T
cloc.o process_ad T
twine.o CON_H R
twine.o CON_L R
twine.o Decode T
twine.o Encode T
twine.o Keyschedule T
twine.o Keyschedule128 T
twine.o Keyschedule80 T
twine.o S R
twine.o ek B
utils.o ae_allocate T
utils.o print_cxt T
utils.o pstate T
utils.o pstate2 T
utils.o xor_bytes T
utils.o xor_bytes2 T