Implementation notes: amd64, margaux, crypto_aead/flexaead128b128v12

Computer: margaux
Microarchitecture: amd64; Core 2 65nm (6fb)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-000006fb-bfebfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20240625
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: flexaead128b128v12
TimeObject sizeTest sizeImplementationCompilerBenchmark dateSUPERCOP version
31202911564 0 027029 804 1088T:opt1gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062920240625
31960513507 0 027667 844 1024T:opt1clang_-march=native_-O_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062920240625
3230177713 0 021384 780 1056T:opt1gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062920240625
33069511549 0 024845 836 1024T:opt1clang_-march=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062920240625
33564416807 0 033235 844 1024T:opt1clang_-mcpu=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062920240625
33675716775 0 033267 844 1024T:opt1clang_-march=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062920240625
33798416775 0 032155 844 1024T:opt1clang_-march=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062920240625
37327923563 0 040011 844 1024T:refclang_-march=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062920240625
37967411641 0 026628 796 1088T:opt1gcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062920240625
38449123611 0 040027 844 1024T:refclang_-mcpu=native_-O3_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062920240625
3851499560 0 022845 836 1024T:refclang_-march=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062920240625
38735823499 0 038835 844 1024T:refclang_-march=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062920240625
39068510518 0 024667 844 1024T:refclang_-march=native_-O_-fwrapv_-Qunused-arguments_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062920240625
39437515028 0 030283 820 1088T:refgcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062920240625
40178216859 0 032523 820 1088T:refgcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-O2_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062920240625
8162766340 0 020182 796 1056T:refgcc_-march=native_-mtune=native_-Os_-fwrapv_-fPIC_-fPIE_-gdwarf-4_-Wall2024062920240625

Checksum failure


473bea2889cd672c502ba6a3e10590ce01f4f0199e88efb19482052642a7471c

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 1, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:opt1gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c:777:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         dirPFK( block, (*self).nBytes, ((*self).subkeys + SUBKEY0),  (*self).nRounds, (*self).state );
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:774:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for( unsigned i = 0; i<(*self).nBytes; i+=8)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:799:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         invPFK( block, (*self).nBytes, ((*self).subkeys + SUBKEY1),  (*self).nRounds, (*self).state );
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:796:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for( unsigned i = 0; i<(*self).nBytes; i+=8)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 2 warnings generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:refclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:refclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:refclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)
T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0)

Compiler output


encrypt.c: In function 'dirShuffleLayer',
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirPFK' at encrypt.c:631:3,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'sumAD.constprop' at encrypt.c:745:5:
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:585:34: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
encrypt.c:   585 |                 *(state+(2*i+0)) = *(block+(0*(blocklen/2)+i));
encrypt.c:       |                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'sumAD.constprop':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:48:18: note: at offset 16 into destination object 'state' of size 16
encrypt.c:    48 |    unsigned char state[BLOCKSIZE];
encrypt.c:       |                  ^~~~~
encrypt.c: In function 'dirShuffleLayer',
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirPFK' at encrypt.c:631:3,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'sumAD.constprop' at encrypt.c:745:5:
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:586:34: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
encrypt.c:   586 |                 *(state+(2*i+1)) = *(block+(1*(blocklen/2)+i));
encrypt.c:       |                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'sumAD.constprop':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:48:18: note: at offset [17, 4294967281] into destination object 'state' of size 16
encrypt.c:    48 |    unsigned char state[BLOCKSIZE];
encrypt.c:       |                  ^~~~~
encrypt.c: In function 'dirShuffleLayer',
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'dirPFK' at encrypt.c:631:3,
encrypt.c:     inlined from 'sumAD.constprop' at encrypt.c:745:5:
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:585:34: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
encrypt.c:   585 |                 *(state+(2*i+0)) = *(block+(0*(blocklen/2)+i));
encrypt.c: ...

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 1, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0)