Test results for amd64, h8bobcat, crypto_aead/present80n6t4silcv2
[Page version: 20241109 15:20:14]
Measurements for amd64, h8bobcat, crypto_aead
Test results for amd64, h8bobcat, crypto_aead
Test results for crypto_aead/present80n6t4silcv2
Computer: h8bobcat
Microarchitecture: amd64; Bobcat (500f10)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: AuthenticAMD-00500f20-178bfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20241022
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: present80n6t4silcv2
Time | Object size | Test size | Implementation | Compiler | Benchmark date | SUPERCOP version |
58706348 | 4951 0 0 | 21192 784 928 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240706 | 20240625 |
60152129 | 3463 0 0 | 19020 816 856 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240706 | 20240625 |
60158493 | 3394 0 0 | 17812 816 856 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240706 | 20240625 |
62511487 | 2338 0 0 | 15110 808 856 | T:ref | clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240706 | 20240625 |
69751717 | 3103 0 0 | 17848 784 928 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240706 | 20240625 |
96456744 | 3937 0 0 | 19868 816 856 | T:ref | clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240706 | 20240625 |
103056237 | 3033 0 0 | 17197 768 928 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240706 | 20240625 |
104002229 | 2515 0 0 | 15988 816 856 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240706 | 20240625 |
303957677 | 2667 0 0 | 15667 760 896 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240706 | 20240625 |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:68:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:63:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c: for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
T:ref | clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Ubuntu_Clang_14.0.0) |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_present80n6t4silcv2_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:63:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: 63 | for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: | ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:68:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c: 68 | return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: | ^~~~~~
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (11.4.0) |