Test results for aarch64, cfarm425, crypto_aead/led80n6t4silcv2

[Page version: 20261005 22:53:57]

Measurements for aarch64, cfarm425, crypto_aead Test results for aarch64, cfarm425, crypto_aead Test results for crypto_aead/led80n6t4silcv2
Computer: cfarm425
Microarchitecture: aarch64; Cortex-A76 (413fd0c1)
Architecture: aarch64
CPU ID: 413fd0c1
SUPERCOP version: 20261004
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: led80n6t4silcv2
TimeObject sizeTest sizeImplementationCompilerBenchmark dateSUPERCOP version
409876267272 4 429444 1208 1544T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2026100520261004

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_led80n6t4silcv2_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:63:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    63 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:68:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    68 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 1, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (16.2.0)

Namespace violations


led.o AddConstants T
led.o AddKey T
led.o DEBUG B
led.o FieldMult T
led.o LED D
led.o LED80_enc T
led.o LED_enc T
led.o MixColMatrix R
led.o MixColumn T
led.o ShiftRow T
led.o SubCell T
led.o WORDFILTER R
led.o sbox R
silc.o ae_encrypt T
silc.o ae_init T
silc.o process_ad T
utils.o print_cxt T
utils.o pstate T
utils.o pstate2 T
utils.o xor_bytes T
utils.o xor_bytes2 T

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 1, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (16.2.0)